Friday, July 15, 2011

Marco Rubio: Show Me a Tax Increase that Creates Jobs!

This speech speaks for itself...

Senator Rubio: “Every other problem we face in our country, the housing crisis, all these other problems become easier to deal with if you have more people working, people making money, people paying their taxes, people spending money into the economy. Unemployment is what we have to get at, and you're not going to create jobs by tax increases.

“And if someone in this building, if someone in Washington has a tax increase that creates jobs, I invite you to offer it. We're all ears. Right now. If someone in Washington has a tax increase that helps create jobs, then now is the time to offer it. I would submit to you you're not going to find one because there are no tax increases that will create jobs. And if you don't create jobs and you don't grow this economy, there is no way out of this debt. You cannot cut your way out of it and you certainly can't tax your way out of it. .......

Marco Rubio: Show Me a Tax Increase that Creates Jobs!

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

I HOPE YOU WILL ALL PARTICIPATE AND DO YOUR PART


The President ordered the cabinet to cut $100 million from the $3.5 trillion federal budget.
I'm so impressed by this sacrifice that I have decided to do the same thing with my personal budget. I spend about $2000 a month on groceries, household expenses, medicine, utilities, etc, but it's time to get out the budget cutting axe, go through my expenses, and cut back.
I'm going to cut my spending at exactly the same ratio, 1/35,000 of my total budget.. After doing the math, it looks like instead of spending $2000 a month; I'm going to have to cut that number by… six cents. Yes, I'm going to have to get by with $1999.94, but that's what sacrifice is all about. I'll just have to do without some things, that are, frankly, luxuries
(Did the president actually think no one would do the math? Please send this around so people understand what this is really about---as if they didn't already know)
John Q. Taxpayer

Saturday, June 25, 2011

A City Can Override a State Law, But a State Cannot Override a Federal Law?? Only in a Liberal America


So if I read the 2 articles below correctly, in a Liberal America a City can override a State Law, declassifying marijuana to a City Ordinance. However a State cannot define how to fund Organizations based on Federal Law, provide for abortions. Insane!!!!!!

Peoria considers local marijuana ordinance

PEORIA -- The Peoria City Council will consider handling the possession of small amounts of marijuana as a violation of a city ordinance rather than a state misdemeanor crime.

Indiana Planned Parenthood seeing Medicaid patients again

INDIANAPOLIS -- Planned Parenthood clinics in Indiana started seeing Medicaid patients again today, the day after a federal judge ruled the state couldn't cut off the organization's public funding for general health services just because it also provides abortions.



Senator Johnson Speaks on Manufacturing

Friday, June 24, 2011

"A Time for Choosing" by Ronald Reagan


Fantastic!!!!

Worth listening to for entire 28 minutes Ronald Reagan speaks.

This was his warning to the USA in 1964.

Don't miss his opening line, "I have spent most of my life as a democrat, I recently have seen fit to follow another course."

Saturday, June 18, 2011

State boards a good place to start cutting

By The Pantagraph Editorial Board | Posted: Friday, June 17, 2011 7:00 am |

We keep hearing from Gov. Pat Quinn and others how much the state's budget has been trimmed and how there's no place to cut without causing harm.

Then we read about the hundreds of boards and commissions the state still has, including about 30 whose members are paid from a few hundred dollars per meeting to six-figure salaries.

But that's not all. Those in paid positions also become eligible for state-supported pensions.

And an analysis by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch found that the more board and commission members are paid, the more they seem to have political connections.

These people are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate. But the Senate doesn't seem to be doing a good job of thoroughly evaluating these appointments.

Here are a few examples reported by the Post-Dispatch.

Members of the Human Rights Commission include the daughter of a former state senators, the sister of a former state senators, the wife of an Illinois Supreme Court justice and the head of an abortion-rights lobby group that contributes more than $1 million to state elections -- the vast majority of that going to Democrats.

The Educational Labor Relations Board includes the wife of a state senator, a former Springfield lobbyist, a former legislative staff member and a former governor's aide. These people are paid a salary of $93,936 each.

Even unpaid boards spend money on conferences and other expenses. Many boards duplicate the work of others or have outlived their usefulness.

This is a long-term problem -- a situation that has been exploited by Republicans and Democrats alike.

Often these appointments have allowed lawmakers who lost a race or decided not to run to greatly pad their pensions with a year or so on a board or commission with higher pay than their legislative salaries.

The number of paid boards doubled under former Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who had pledged to cut them down to a handful.

By The Pantagraph Editorial Board | Posted: Friday, June 17, 2011 7:00 am |

Quinn has continued the dubious tradition of appointing former lawmakers to these posts -- with the accompanying suspicion that the jobs are traded for votes.

For example, Michael Smith, who lost a re-election bid, was recently named to the Education Labor Relations Board. Quinn also nominated another lawmaker who lost re-election to a paid post, but withdrew the nomination after questions were raised about her switching her vote from "no" to "yes" on the tax hike.

Before we hear any more talk about doomsday cuts, more borrowing and a lack of fat in the budget, Quinn and lawmakers should provide a specific plan for a very significant reduction in the number of boards and commissions.

And for those that remain, any paid positions should be commensurate with the time and effort needed to serve.

Copyright 2011 pantagraph.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



share